AI Product Manager

🔥 13 minutes ago

🇺🇸 United States – Remote

⏰ Full Time

🟡 Mid-level

🟠 Senior

✅ Product Manager

🦅 H1B Visa Sponsor

This company has sponsored H1B visas in the past.

👻 Ghost score 12%

What it means: how likely this posting is sitting open without active hiring.How to read it: 60% or higher means we think this is a ghost. Lower scores are less of a worry.How we score it: age, reposts, open roles vs team size, how fast jobs close, and whether pay is listed.Fine print: an estimate from public data, not a judgment of the company. Real jobs can score high, so treat it as a hint, not a fact.

Apply Now

Find Similar Remote Jobs

Set Up Email Alert For New Jobs

📊 Check your resume score for this job

Improve your chances of getting an interview by checking your resume score before you apply.

Upload Resume

K1X

WebsiteLinkedInAll Job Openings

11 - 50 employees

💼 Consulting

🏥 Healthcare

⚖️ Legal

Consulting • Healthcare • Legal

K1X is an AI-powered platform that specializes in streamlining alternative investment tax compliance for investors and advisors. The platform offers various automated solutions, including K1 Aggregator for automating the receipt and analysis of K-1 Form data, K1 Creator for digital production of K-1 forms, and 990 Tracker for automating exempt reporting and filing. K1X utilizes patented AI technology to ensure high accuracy and reduce manual data extraction time. It is designed to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance transparency in tax processes, particularly where alternative investments are concerned.

📋 Description

• Own a rolling six-to-twelve-month AI roadmap for extraction coverage, accuracy, and the underlying platform; size it against team capacity, sequence dependencies, re-plan as evidence changes, and represent it in portfolio planning. • Intake and prioritize requests for new document types, forms, and fields using defensible frameworks such as RICE, WSJF, Kano, opportunity scoring, and voice-of-customer synthesis. • Ensure prioritized items include definitions and test data needed for validation, and explain prioritization decisions to stakeholders. • Own how accuracy is defined and reported for executives, customers, Product, and Engineering. • Translate model-level measures such as per-field precision, coverage, and straight-through rate into user outcomes, including missed data, user corrections, and touches needed for filing-ready results. • Own the recurring accuracy report. • Provide product requirements for model and vendor decisions, including customer-relevant accuracy, cost, and latency thresholds, business cases, budgets, and release acceptance criteria. • Maintain decision records for model and vendor choices. • Plan engineering reserve around September–November filing peaks and own scope and dates for the January tax-year release. • Set defect-intake service levels with Client Success and QA, and keep proof-of-concept work time-boxed. • Partner with product managers and UX to turn user corrections into field-level provenance signals and a confidence-driven review experience.

🎯 Requirements

• 4+ years of product management on shipped B2B software, ideally fintech or regtech where a wrong number costs more than a slow one, with at least 2 years owning an AI/ML-powered product surface: document AI or extraction, search and ranking, LLM features, or an ML platform. • Fluent in the mechanics: capacity planning against a real team, prioritization frameworks (RICE, WSJF, Kano, voice-of-customer synthesis), roadmap sizing, release management, and PRDs an engineer would actually read. • Understand how ML products fail differently from software: precision and recall trade-offs, evaluation sets, drift, cost per inference, and why "the model got it wrong" is a product question first. • Have made or shaped build, buy, or replace calls on model or vendor components, and can walk through one that went badly. • Write clearly and run a tight meeting. Half this job is turning engineers' conviction into a decision document Product, Tax, and Finance can act on. • Tax-domain knowledge is not required; Tax Content owns the rules and CPAs adjudicate. Curiosity is; the interesting failure modes live in the footnotes.